I was also reluctant to move from VC2008 to VC2010. But after more than 6 months, the move is ok. My experience is that the IDE is stable (I dare to say more than VC2008). The IDE is slower but this remains ok. However, when working intensively on a big project, I sometimes have to quit and relaunch the IDE after a few hours, to recover original speed.
Philippe On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:56:32 -0600 Charley Bay <charleyb...@gmail.com> wrote: Show of hands -- those of you on Win7x64, are you using MSVC2008 or MSVC2010? > > > We're a Qt-Win-Commercial customer, and our internal "reference-compiler" is > MSVC2008. We've had issues with MSVC2010 (mostly that it's so *slow*, and > the IDE is not as stable). We ship based on MSVC2008+SP1. > > > We are *very* interested in the soon-to-be-released Qt5. > > > Looking at the Qt5 release-platforms page, I don't see "Win7x64/MSVC2008" > listed: > > > <http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt_5.0> > > > Not a biggie, but this implies we must move from MSVC2008 to MSVC2010 (we > want "Tier-1"). > > > I'm not advocating either way, I just want to understand what people are > doing -- I thought quite a lot of people stayed on MSVC2008 (and did not go > to MSVC2010). > > > As an aside, we've been watching the MSVC2012 "Release Candidate" that is > out, it seems to solve some issues associated with MSVC2010, but drops > native-targetting-for-XP (we don't care, but some might). Any thoughts about > levels-of-support for MSVC2012? > > > Digia -- care to comment? > > > Thanks! > > > --charley > >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
