Hi, On Monday 10 December 2012 14:01:15 BOUCARD Olivier wrote: > Thanks for the answer.
You're welcome. > Yes, at the moment it is only to use it. So I keep going on this list. > > I following this project since a while now. It is strange that is not a > prominent module as, IMHO, it is the greatest addition to QML I have seen. We hope to rectify this in the coming months. :) > While it could be a good idea to think about third part solution > integration. I think keeping a "low-level" interface could be great. > Because OSG or OGRE may reduce flexibility and make thing too complex for > small project. Don't worry, nobody is talking about destroying what is there. We mean to add integration in addition to the built-in capabilities but doing so in a way so as to not add additional dependencies for those that do not need this feature. How best to do so cleanly still requires some thought though. > The editor problem is probably link to the same issue as QtCreator still > look in the import folder. Quite possible indeed. The patch I mentioned is integrating right now so hopefully that will solve it. All the best, Sean -- Dr Sean Harmer | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
