On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those > on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client instead > has enormous benefits. Having to download 10MB of JS is a small price > to pay. If that really was such a concern, YouTube wouldn't bee that > popular. > > And here we are finally, back to the thin client vs fat client debate :-) It always happens when webapps are involved. -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
