24.01.2013, 21:34, "Jordi Pujol" <[email protected]>: >>> It's possible to, simplify that process ? I have no problem to sign a >>> disclaimer like "I wrote that code, but I give all the rights to i.e. >>> digia/Kdab/<write_here_your_company>" and then send my patches to >>> someone in that company that evaluates them and pushes it to gerrit in >>> behalf of me. >> Let's consider imaginary situation when some party claims that Qt contains >> copyrighted code, and points to code lines coming from your patches. Who >> should be charged? Persons who submitted your patch, because git blame shows >> them. > > Sure. Note that I've said "I sign a disclaimer saying I'VE wrote that > code...blah, blah". Blames to me ( a simple note on commit, and solved > ). I'm not a lawyer, so perhaps I'm absolutely wrong, but we can always > find a simple solution for this case. > > P.S. : I've just seen a "Tools->Git->Gerrit..." option in QtCreator. Is > that a try to integrate gerrit interaction with QtCreator ? It could be > a great solution to simple patches as ours...
There is some interaction built-in and it can certainly be extended, but I believe that registration of user account doesn't belong there. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
