On segunda-feira, 15 de abril de 2013 18.18.36, K. Frank wrote: > Thank you for the clear answer. As a follow-up, do you think it is close > enough to being compilable with c++11 that I might be able to patch it > myself? Or would that be a trip down the rabbit hole, so to speak?
I think I tried once and gave up. Their code uses TR1 all over the place, which is source-incompatible with finalised C++11. > > The buildsystem for those *does* remove -std=c++0x and -std=gnu++0x, so if > > you use the old switches, Qt should compile. > > I don't follow what you mean here. Could you explain how the build > system goes about removing -std=gnu++11? (In my case it didn't.) It does not remove -std=gnu++11. it removes -std=gnu++0x if you have that. So I'm recommending you use - std=gnu++0x instead of -std=c++11. > And what you mean when you refer to "the old switches"? See above. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
