Hi,
how did you try to build this? Did you use qmake, plain make, cmake, ...?
However, I think you do need a constructor for classes that are processed
by moc - at least it is good style to provide one. One like this would be
sufficient:
C++-98: NewTest(){}
C++-11: NewTest()=default;
Also, it is bad style to declare moc'ed classes in the CPP file. Please
use headers for this. If it is a private class (one only used inside this
one module) the convention is to name the header with _p.h, e.g.
NewTest_p.h, this way other programmers in the team know they are not
supposed to #include this header without asking first.
Konrad
On Mon, May 19, 2014 13:17, Graham Labdon wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I declare a class in a cpp file -
> #include <QObject>
>
> class NewTest : public QObject
> {
> Q_OBJECT
>
> private slots:
> void s1();
> };
>
> void NewTest::s1()
> {
>
> }
>
> #include "NewTest.moc"
>
> The moc compiler is not invoked
> However, if I declare a constructor for NewTest it is
>
> Can anyone explain why this is?
>
> I am writing some unit tests and do not need the constructor.
>
> Once the moc has been invoked I can remove the constructor and then
> everything works as expected
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
