I will try it, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:03 PM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday December 17 2014 21:21:29 Liang Jian wrote: > > > The second way require modification of libjpeg-turbo ( maybe remove > the > >entire old libjpeg style API ) which is beyond me. > > It's really not difficult, but it will be a bit of work to ensure that you > rename everything that has to be renamed. Functions that are not exported > from the library (which includes all that are marked static) won't have to > be renamed for instance. > The goal is simply to avoid having 2 functions with the same name. > If you're working in C++ you might be able to achieve this by putting all > of libjpeg-turbo in its own namespace. > > R. > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
