On Friday February 06 2015 13:12:32 Michael Jackson wrote: > I am doing pretty vanilla C++ development. We use Qt as our base for > everything. We generate a GUI for data analysis which gets distributed to > users, *not* developers. Those users do not have MacPorts on their systems.
Evidently MacPorts isn't the most suitable choice in that case, and that's why I queried about the kind of development you're doing. > Every time I have tried MacPorts in order to get a redistributable product I > have to bring most of the entire MacPorts system into the .app bundle > including libc++ and libc which seems awfully fishy to me. Those are standard > libraries that are on every OS X machine that is out there. That's weird and shouldn't be necessary, but also a different topic. > > NO. The _proper_ way is that Digia's package is updated and corrected. Why do > _I_ have to fix their problems. And why aren't they building on a completely > clean OS X machine that just has the necessary Apple supplied compilers? OK: > > That way you can use whatever bundling methods you use to bundle the Qt > > libraries with your products < < until Digia fixes their installer I take it you have filed a bug report about this? ;) R. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
