Hi Scott, On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4? >
well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin been fixed. The browser pdf plugins are a must for me (no alternative for using a pdf reader on end user systems), so I must wait for webengine to provide a replacement for these ... on devdays there has been mentioned that nsapi support is not planned to be implemented so that makes me worry a bit ... Currently webkit works fine for me and due to the latest talk on the list I expect it to keep working during the qt5 lifetime. Even compiling webengine took me very loooooong - just finding out about its dependencies was a hell! For me it does definitely not feel like being ready for production use. Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org > [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:00 AM > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... > > On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > What is the status of Qt WebEngine? > > > > Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production > > quality applications yet? > > > > Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it > > been fully replaced and fully working. > > > > The webpages I render in my app, are pretty simple, no media to worry > > about. > currently no support for nsapi plugins (adobe ...). > > Frank > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
