What a mess this new website. In the old website you could clearly compare the different types of licenses and make your decision easily, now all you have is a weird wizard and generic terms like "Additional professional development features, tools & functionality". Really? What exactly it means for someone who never touched Qt?
If Qt keeps this way I'm considering to look for alternatives. Em dom, 5 de jul de 2015 às 19:43, Thiago Macieira < thiago.macie...@intel.com> escreveu: > On Sunday 05 July 2015 14:05:46 Kate Alhola wrote: > > > On 05 Jul 2015, at 09:05, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > >> On Saturday 04 July 2015 21:36:29 Kate Alhola wrote: > > >> But i proposed alternative that does not cost anything but may bring a > > >> lot > > >> of profits later. > > > > > > I think you're wrong. There's a cost associated with the program, at > least > > > to keep the website running, with the online store and registration, > and > > > someone to look over the activity. The cost is not zero. > > > > I know, selling Indie developer licence has costs but for that reason I > > proposed just amendment tom LGPL that allows use of Qt in certain mobile > > closed source apps when monthly revenue is under 10000€. There is no need > > any extra work compared to LGPL. If someone wants violate licence, they > can > > do it with LGPL. There is no more need for looking over than in LGPL > cases. > > You're basically saying that we should add yet another licence to Qt's > current > tri-licensing scheme: > > * LGPLv2.1 > * GPLv3 > * Commercial/Enterprise > * Indie Mobile > > Is that it? > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
