Qt extended indie mobile until Aug 31: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/07/06/indie-mobile-available-until-aug-31st/
>> Application Development offering provides all desktop and mobile platforms and the subscription price is actually a lot cheaper than it was previously ($350 vs. $399). 350 vs 399 is not "lot cheaper" and completely not affordable for an individual developer :( I really hope they get a huge demand now and reconsider their decision. Best, Daniel Em seg, 6 de jul de 2015 às 10:46, Nuno Santos <nunosan...@imaginando.pt> escreveu: > Hi, > > In one year I have never seen such an hot topic in this list. > > One year ago I have founded Imaginando. During the last year I have been > telling everyone I know that this could only be possible with Qt. > > It’s not easy to convince people that they should adopt Qt for iOS and > Android development, despite the clear advantages of having a single code > base for two or more platforms. Now, with this price tag, it’s clearly > impossible! > > If you had this price tag one year ago. All the work I have been > developing from one year now, wouldn’t simply exist. I have developed two > apps and a half on a single year and i’m just starting. I’m ALONE and i’m > surviving from my SALES. I don’t plan to have investment unless I cannot > manage to scale my sales in the next 6 months. > > If I wasn’t already a indie developer subscriber, right now, I would be in > a very complicated situation. > > I also AGREE with many of the statements already shared in this discussion > regarding the website. Qt website is a mess regarding licensing and pricing. > > There SHOULD be an item on the website clearly saying: PRICING > > This are clear pricing table examples. Qt pricing table is not existent > now. The wizard is a complete mess… > > https://parse.com/plans > https://www.zendesk.com/product/pricing/ > https://www.xero.com/pricing/ > http://mailchimp.com/pricing/ > http://www.shopify.com/pricing > > You guys have a GREAT product! You should definitely listen and support > your small developers. They are your technology evangelists. Don’t ruin it > with awkward pricing strategies. > > Once again: Qt rocks! > > Regards, > > Nuno Santos > Founder / CEO / CTO > www.imaginando.pt > +351 91 621 69 62 > > On 06 Jul 2015, at 09:07, Robert Iakobashvili <corobe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Tuukka, > To sell a product, you need to have it. > > When you declared the license, your stock was empty > since Qt for Android and iOS was too buggy and without many crucial > features. > > It could be a separate discussion whether Qt for iOS/Android is stable > enough > for production today, but at least many people have started to develop > their apps > with a hope that future expected Qt stability and features can deliver > stable Qt-based applications for iOS and Android. > > Let's say you have this product for 1 month, optimistically for 2-3 months > (many developers to say that even today iOS/Android ports stability > is not enough to start using it). > > Is it enough time to make a judgement? > > Qt for Desktop is the best GUI framework for today, > and I'm confident that in 2-3 years Qt for Mobile will be as lucrative > as for Desktop. > > However, this is not the case today and your product for Mobile is too > risky, > too limited with only enthusiast and early adapters starting to try it. > > Even if you restore the Indie license tomorrow, it will take > some time to convince developers that Qt for iOS/Android is stable enough, > it will take more time for developers to accomplish their applications > full of work-arounds > around Qt-issues and missed features and to start orders. > > Please, let your decision makers to look into this very interesting > discussion. > > Consider making your Indie for Mobile less restrictive i.e. > with higher threshold like 300 000 or 500 000. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Robert > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Turunen Tuukka > <tuukka.turu...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > We have decided to discontinue that product. Those who have it, can > continue just as before. New subscriptions are no longer sold. > > There was unfortunately too little interest towards this product. > > We have a new Qt for Application Development product that contains all > leading desktop and mobile platforms under commercial license, silver > support, as well as all value-add tooling and functionality. > > Yours, > > Tuukka > > "m...@rpzdesign.com" <m...@rpzdesign.com> kirjoitti 2.7.2015 kello 2.52: > > Could not find the indie mobile program option with 5.5 release. > > "The Qt Company Introduces a Unified Website and 20€/$25 Monthly Indie > Mobile Package" > > Where is it? > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest