Rainer Wiesenfarth wrote: > I _think_ that the first command resolves references strictly ordered > (Q55Sql first, then Qt5Core) while the second resolves them in common. > > In this case, using > > ... -lQt5Sql -lQt5Core -lQt5Sql ... > > should solve the issue.
I started trying that, but didn't check all combinations yet. In any case, -lQt5Sql -lQt5Core -lQt5Sql -lQt5Core doesn't even reduce the number of errors. I also think that modern linkers no longer have the limitation you refer to. > Another guess: Does replacing "-lQt5Core.so" with "-lQt5Core" in the > first command change the behavior? OOps, that was an editing error (my actual paths are more convoluted). So that actual command was -lQt5Core without the extension (which would fail with a "lib not found" kind of error). > > Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Rainer Wiesenfarth > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
