> Both are correct, since one is implemented in terms of the other. That means > they MUST expand to exactly the same assembly (and they do, I've just tested). > > If you're seeing something different, the problem is probably your code. And > that's why Marc is recommending qSwap: because people don't know how to use > std::swap. There's a big gotcha: you MUST NOT write the "std::" part of > std::swap.
At the risk of making a fool of myself, what is the difference? I thought I had learned that namespaces were just a scoping mechanism for names to avoid name collisions. Why does this make such a difference in the generated code? I'm old enough now that the risk of making a fool of myself is a small price to pay in order to learn something. -John Weeks _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
