On 26 January 2016 at 22:16, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > > The most helpful initiatives for Qt is the one that de-fragments it. Qt > community isn't big enough to cut it into pieces... > > > I completely agree. We are too small to be fragmented. We should resolve > this sooner than later. I also like the idea that it gets carried forth by > an organization - as part of the project a first-class binary like qmake. > > Thanks Jason. PS: It's not that Cutehacks do not get credit where credit is due. Let me just mention it already gets credit for awesome evangelism/popularization of Qt technologies especially with Qt Quick. Just like KDAB for evangelism/education/extra useful tools/co-creation of the whole niche. And ICS. Just like Kitware for CMake.
(OK here's some fragmentation in the buildsystems space if someone counts qbs in the game too but before qbs, CMake/QMake addressed quite distinct use cases and complemented each other) And I can't forget to say thank you for all code contributions and co-maintainership. It's all so much based on a common sense, no reason for not cooperating. -- regards, Jaroslaw Staniek KDE: : A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators : and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org Calligra Suite: : A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org Kexi: : A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi Qt Certified Specialist: : http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
