Hi André, > That should work just fine, with the exception of using &m_thread as a > member.
thanks for your answer. I am, however, not sure what you mean regarding the m_thread member. For a better understanding here is a working example I have in mind: ************************************************** #include <QtCore> class Foo : public QObject { Q_OBJECT public: Foo() : QObject(nullptr) { moveToThread(&m_thread); m_thread.start(); } ~Foo() { m_thread.quit(); m_thread.wait(); } void printFooInformation() const { qDebug() << "foo affinity" << thread(); } void printThreadInformation() const { qDebug() << "m_thread affinity" << m_thread.thread(); } private: QThread m_thread; }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QCoreApplication a(argc, argv); qDebug() << "GUI affinity" << a.thread(); Foo *foo = new Foo; foo->printThreadInformation(); foo->printFooInformation(); return a.exec(); } #include "main.moc" ************************************************** Of course, every instance of Foo would create a new thread and therefor multiple instance of Foo would _not_ share the same thread. Did you mean that? (In my special case this is intended.) Lorenz _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest