> Am 17.03.2016 um 07:39 schrieb André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl>:
>
> ...
> I find that much more readable than having to look in some signals section to
> find if there is a notification signal, and then in some slots section to see
> if the setter is perhaps declared as a slot or not.
That's an entire different view than what I've had so far (since so far I've
never used those new "PFM"-style connections. What does it even mean? "Printing
with Manual Formatting"? ;))
And I must say André's point makes very much sense, too :)
And if I'm not completely mistaken with the old style connections an explicit
[private|protected|public] slots: section is always needed, in order for the
moc to recognise the method to be a "slot", no?
Or is this also just syntactical sugar when it comes to /connecting/ a slot
(ignoring the generated meta data for the moment)?
For instance I know that the private|public specifier has absolutely no
influence on the "connectability" of a slot, that is you can connect a signal
to a private slot from /outside/ the class...
Cheers,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
