29.11.2016, 14:57, "André Somers" <an...@familiesomers.nl>: > Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev: >> 29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" <an...@familiesomers.nl>: >>> Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> We use Qt under LGPL license. >>>> >>>> We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >>>> connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. >>>> >>>> What do we must to do next to obey the license terms? >>>> >>>> Publish the changes somewhere? >>> We ended up shipping the actual patches we made in the installer, >>> putting them in a separate directory together and referencing them from >>> the licences section in our about box. We kept around the Qt sources for >>> the Qt we shipped with the product in the office in case anyone would >>> ever ask for them (nobody ever did, of course). >> Looks like a violation of LGPL. Section 6 requires you to provide >> _complete_ source code or written offer to do so. > > We did offer, in the license text in the about screen.
Ah, than it's probably OK > We didn't ship > the complete Qt sources with the product though, but we kept them them > around in case anyone would ever ask. Same for some other libs we used > and patched by the way. In my non-lawyer opinion, that is not an LGPL > violation. > > André -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest