Hi Jake,
TLDR:
• Please update docs to include mention of deployment target,
• People run older versions sometimes because of inertia of large projects
• Qt support of two versions back matches Apple’s support policy.
I was looking at this this week, and wanted the same question answered… It
would be nice to add a note to the docs stating that the minimum supported
platform for OS-X is a deployment target as well as a compilation target…
Our current shipping software on OSX is a 32 bit system is targeting 10.7 (yes,
I know, ancient, see below). Since I am in the process of updating to
AVFoundation, and since nothing in the docs said I couldn’t, I was able to
build against Qt 5.9.3 with a deployment target of 10.7 (w/ libc++). I
haven’t tried to run it on an actual system yet, and based on your comments, I
am not going to try. We are going to move to supporting 10.9 for now.
Why do people run on older deployment targets? Inertia of large projects! Our
video module on OSX was written 7 years ago to support OSX 10.7 using QtKit,
which was deprecated at the time. While we have been aware of this for several
years, I have only now been assigned to write an AVFoundation replacement
because the 32 bit subsystem (and hence QtKit), is finally being pulled from
the operating system. In general, if you have a large software project, there
is always tension between moving forward on things like operating systems (we
support Mac, Windows, iOS, Android, and Chromebooks here), and writing new
code. In practice, this often means that the schedule only finds time to
upgrade to newer platforms when we are forced to.
While I agree with Shawn Rutledge’s comments about planned obsolescence, it is
probably worth mentioning in this discussion that Apple generally provides
security updates for two or maybe three major versions, and Qt is in line with
that. I couldn’t find an Apple reference for that, but this stack overflow
post has some relevant if older discussion:
https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/47664/what-is-apples-policy-for-supporting-security-updates-on-older-versions-of-os-x
Steve Schilz
PASCO scientific
think science
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Jake Petroules <jake.petrou...@qt.io>
wrote:
>> > On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Hamish Moffatt <ham...@risingsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/supported-platforms.html lists the supported
>> macOS environments, but it's not clear if it's the same versions (10.10+)
>> for runtime (deployment) as well as development, or whether running on
>> earlier versions is supported. Does anyone know?
>>
>> Currently we support the same minimum version for both runtime and
>> development. Currently this is macOS 10.10 for Qt 5.9. Earlier OS versions
>> will not work and will crash.
>>
>> > http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.10/supported-platforms.html suggests
>> that 5.10 will increase this requirement further to 10.11+. Why is this?
>>
>> We decided it wasn't worth the resources to continue testing with 10.10.
>> macOS upgrades are now free and the overwhelming majority of users are on
>> the latest version.
>>
>> Why do you need to support older versions?
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Hamish
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Interest mailing list
>> > Interest@qt-project.org
>> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>
>> --
>> Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@qt.io
>> The Qt Company - Silicon Valley
>> Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
