Am January 25, 2021 2:47:28 PM UTC schrieb "Olivier B."
<perso.olivier.barthel...@gmail.com>:
>Oh, you are right, thanks. I thought the + operator was on a QString
>and
>adding a char would be faster than adding a 1-char string, but it just
>changed the char* pointer address instead.
>
>Le lun. 25 janv. 2021 à 15:32, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest <
>interest@qt-project.org> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Il 25/01/21 13:56, Olivier B. ha scritto:
>> > fields += (fields.isEmpty() ? "" : ", ") + '"' + field +
>'"';
>>
>> QStringBuilder usage is a red herring, pay close attention at what
>> you're doing in the first +: you're summing a const char * (result of
>> the ternary operator) with a char; that does not do string
>concatenation...
>>
>> > Passing one/both of the operands of the ternary operator as
>QStrings
>> makes the problem disappear.
>>
>> That however kills the advantage of QStringBuilder. Use QStringView /
>> QLatin1String instead.
>>
>> Tip: always define QT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII (or the more lenient
>> QT_RESTRICTED_CAST_FROM_ASCII) in any Qt project.
>>
>> HTH,
>> --
>> Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software
>Engineer
>> KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
>> Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
>> KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest@qt-project.org
>> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>>
we're coming closer to Bobby Tables;' now xD
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
