Thanks for your feedback. The latter statement is correct as we are trying to solve the problem due to lack of understanding.
Best Regards, Ramakanth On Wed, 30 Aug, 2023, 01:25 Thiago Macieira, <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On Monday, 28 August 2023 23:34:26 PDT Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. > > As we donot set any stack size for QThread and it looks like it runs out > of > > default stack size limit during long running operation. Hence would like > to > > measure the cumulative stack variables used in a thread so as to set > stack > > size of QThread accordingly. > > That's not how stacks work: long-running has nothing to do with the size > of > the stack. What matters for stack depth is just that: how deeply do you > recurse. > > So I repeat the question: why do you think you need to change anything? Do > you > have a concrete problem? > > Because if you don't, it looks like you're trying to solve a problem that > doesn't exist out of a misunderstanding of how things work. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
