I definitly think that redundancy would be very nice. Heck make it
so IM servers can back each other up. One polls certain maps and is
backup on others and if the second server drops off the first will
then poll all of the maps?
Then again I've been doing tons of DNS work lately and might be
influenced by that model ;)
On Dec 11, 2006, at 6:18 PM, William W. Fisher wrote:
Kevin:
Thank you for your comments on redundancy and admin permissions.
We'll definitely take your thoughts into consideration as we move
forward.
Does anyone else have any thoughts along these lines?
Regards,
Bill Fisher
Dartware, LLC
On Dec 10, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Kevin Wigle wrote:
Hello Group,
I noticed that this topic may have got buried in the wrong thread
so please
pardon the re-post.
I am trying to push the opportunities that Intermapper can provide.
To really make Intermapper a true enterprise application in the
eyes of some
of our engineers, things like redundancy would make selling
Intermapper
further in our government department an easier chore.
Redundancy
...
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%
40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
