I haven't done a comparison, but imagecopyrotated() isn't something I made -- I ported it from the latest version of the GD library. If you think you could make a better imagecopyrotated() I don't have a problem with it, but I don't really see a great deal of need.
John -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~- John Coggeshall john at coggeshall dot org http://www.coggeshall.org/ -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~- >-----Original Message----- >From: Pierre-Alain Joye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:11 PM >To: John Coggeshall >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Three new GD functions > > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:11:04 -0500 >"John Coggeshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I've ported three GD functions from the 2.0.12 version of GD >into the >> bundled version: imagesetclip(), imagegetclip(), and >> imagecopyrotated()... I may go through and port more but I wanted to >> see the response to this before I wasted more time... > >I can take care of imagecopyrotated using the actual >imagerotate function, which provides a better quality. > >Do you agree? > >pierre > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
