On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Marcus B�rger wrote:
>At 19:48 05.04.2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Marcus B�rger wrote:
>>
>> >I just noticed the fact that --enable-all also works for all --with-xyz by
>> >being mailed about it. IMHO there should be an --with-all. This because
>> >we have a clear difference between --enable-xy and --with-xy. This
>> >difference should hold for --enable-all, too.
>>
>> I never advertized --enable-all. It was just a side-effect of
>> --disable-all and should never be used by anyone.
>>
>> I removed the --enable-all from the configure help now.
>> I'll disable it fully later..
>>
>
>Jani, IMO --enable-all is a good thing but it shouldn't apply to --with
>extensions. So perhaps we should have an undocumented --with-all
>and make --enable-all what it is supposed to.
No. --disable-all is fine as it is. I don't want to add any MORE
options to get the smallest possible build:
./configure --disable-all --disable-cgi
Having to add also --without-all..well..it's just stupid.
--Jani
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
