> I think in the long run it tends to be a bit ugly, but I don't see any
> alternative right now, because merging the CVS histories doesn't seem to be
> feasible to me. So I'm OK with it for now.
With the empty branch concept, the unused engine directory
contains only a single anti-pruning file.
That would mean that the following branches need to emptied:
ZE1: HEAD
ZE2: PHP_4, PHP_4_3
> However, I am not convinced that having to explicitly checkout the PHP_5
> branch is such a good idea. I thought the idea was to have HEAD be the
> current development version and branch if off when necessary. I would
> prefer this kind of approach.
That looks preferably to me as well. I've updated the
instructions.
http://schumann.cx/phpcvs.txt
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
