On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 10:33 PM Mike Schinkel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2. Do we really want to add a standard library function 53 characters > long? > > Can we not come up with a more concise name than > get_defined_functions_allowed_in_constant_expressions(), like maybe > get_const_expr_funcs() or get_const_expressions()? > For once, we would have a function with a self-describing, clear name: let's not butcher it with abbreviations please :-) CTRL+SPACE is your friend. Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/
