> On Mar 22, 2021, at 10:38, Levi Morrison via internals 
> <internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM Guilliam Xavier
> <guilliam.xav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aa...@trowski.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 19, 2021, at 5:47 PM, Levi Morrison <levi.morri...@datadoghq.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:54 PM Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com 
>>>> <mailto:m...@kelunik.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey Levi,
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aa...@trowski.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Greetings everyone!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote has started on the fiber RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers 
>>>>>>> <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Voting will run through March 22nd.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Aaron Piotrowski
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is selfish, but I would like to kindly request lengthening the
>>>>>> voting window to allow me more time to play with it. I feel like I
>>>>>> can't vote "yes" on something like this without more experience with
>>>>>> it (which is why I currently have voted "no"). I hope others would
>>>>>> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> How much time do you think you need?
>>>> 
>>>> Another week seems reasonable; enough time to evaluate it more
>>>> thoroughly but not delay things seriously.
>>> 
>>> This is fine with me. Let's extend voting for about another week, ending on 
>>> 3/28 at about 11 PM EDT.
>> 
>> 
>> I'm afraid you can't: from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#voting
>> 
>>> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not 
>>> be changed during the vote.
>> 
>> (Not that I care personally, but you would take the risk of the vote being 
>> invalidated...)
>> 
>> --
>> Guilliam Xavier
> 
> We should dig through the history, because the line before that is in 
> conflict:
> 
>> Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors discretion 
>> this may be extended, for example during holiday periods.
>> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not 
>> be changed during the vote.


I interpret that line to mean that the author may decide to extend the
voting period prior to declaring the valid voting period when voting is
started.

I also cannot find anything in the rules that allows for the author
canceling an ongoing vote, but I believe we’ve done that in the past.

Cheers,
Ben


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to