On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 1:02 PM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 5:20 PM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> > wrote: > > > Greetings, Internalians. > > > > Some months back I proposed an RFC for short functions. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-functions > > > > After some discussion, I put it on hold to ensure that it was compatible > > with the other discussion floating about around an alternate syntax for > > multi-line closures that did auto-capture. It's important that the > syntax > > of both proposals is consistent. > > > > Nuno Maduro and i have talked recently and worked out the syntax that is > > consistent between both proposals. That takes 'fn' off the table for > > short-functions, for reasons discussed in both RFCs. > > > > To that end, I offer: > > > > 1) The updated short-functions RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-functions > > > > 2) A new RFC, code by Nuno, for auto-capturing multi-statement closures: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/auto-capture-closure > > > > These are separate RFCs and at this time we plan to send them to separate > > votes, but I list them together to demonstrate that they have been > > developed in a mutually-compatible way. > > > > Further details in the auto-capture-closure RFC. > > > > Could you please create two separate threads for these RFCs? > > Nikita > I guess my one question would be why we didn't support auto-capture when we first implemented anonymous functions, and if there was a reason, why does that no longer apply? -- Chase Peeler chasepee...@gmail.com
