> The proposed syntax > > $array |> array_map($fn1, ?) |> array_filter(?, $fn2) > > When I compare to: > > $array->map($fn1)->filter($fn2) > > 1. It's longer. Much longer. > 2. It still requires knowing where the array goes. That's legacy which we > could sidestep with the arrow notation. > 3. Admittedly, the pipe is much more powerful.
While the argument No. 2. is completely valid, the 1st one is not so. If you remove whitespaces around the `|>` and also if you alias these functions to `map` and `filter` respectively (or if, for instance, some future RFC moves them into a special `PHP\Array` namespace, which would probably never happen, but it's allowed to dream), it could look like this: ```php $array|>map($fn1, ?)|>filter(?, $fn2); $array->map($fn1)->filter($fn2); ``` A bit longer (due to 2.), but not that much, actually. Best wishes, someniatko -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
