On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 15:19, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 8:48 AM Craig Francis <cr...@craigfrancis.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Is there any value in me proposing an RFC to update *some* internal >> functions so they can accept NULL? >> > > I'm not hard against this idea. The interpretation of null in these > contexts as being equivalent to empty string isn't unreasonable. I guess > the only objection I could have would be an academic one and I can't really > defend that. So yeah, sure... why not? >
Thanks Sara, I've spent a few days coming up with a short(ish) list of parameters that are likely to receive `NULL`. The focus is on making it easier for developers to upgrade to newer versions of PHP. I'm thinking of the typical developer, probably using WordPress, isn't using Psalm (at levels 1 to 3, with no baseline), and isn't using `strict_types`; where they don't really have the time to add strval() to everything that could be NULL. Draft RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_null And the list, where I'm proposing we only relax this requirement for the *bold* parameters: https://github.com/craigfrancis/php-allow-null-rfc/blob/main/functions-change.md I'll give it a few weeks to see if there are any parameter suggestions (welcome via email, pull request, carrier pigeon, etc), then I'll start looking for the best way to implement this. Craig PS; starting new thread, as I have gone a bit off topic, original one at: https://externals.io/message/116519#116556
