On 24 February 2022 09:47:39 CET, Go Kudo <g-k...@colopl.co.jp> wrote: > >Hi > >RFC has been updated. Is this up to the required standard? >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > >I acknowledge that the previous RFC may have been difficult to discuss. If >the problem has been solved, I would like to make another ML-wide >announcement and wait for two weeks from there. > >I added PCG64 because according to the RNG experts, there seems to be a >mild conflict between Xorshiro256 and PCG64. Also, as mentioned in the RFC, >Rust and NumPy also implement PCG64. > >In order to verify the feasibility of PCG64, we created a PoC in C. So far, >it seems to work fine. >https://github.com/zeriyoshi/pcg64_example > >Regards, >Go Kudo
Hello, Two small nits: - The "Backward Incompatible Changes" section is missing the fact that `\Random\Randomizer` will be reserved. - In the definition of `Randomizer` in the "Proposal" section, there is a typo: `function getBytes(int $legnth)` should be `$length` instead. To me, this RFC looks very good so far - I don't have a vote however. Regards, Mel -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
