On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:25 PM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> > Also, not proposing level 1 on the grounds that it would reduce the > argument for level 2/3 in the future would effectively be holding level 1 > functionality "hostage" for the more advanced versions, which... would > probably not work out well. :-) (Even if that's not your intent, it would > come off that way.) > > > Yes, I also realize that, which is another reason I'm thinking that doing comparison-only overloads first might be the better way forward.