On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:25 PM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com>
wrote:

>
> Also, not proposing level 1 on the grounds that it would reduce the
> argument for level 2/3 in the future would effectively be holding level 1
> functionality "hostage" for the more advanced versions, which... would
> probably not work out well. :-)  (Even if that's not your intent, it would
> come off that way.)
>
>
>
Yes, I also realize that, which is another reason I'm thinking that doing
comparison-only overloads first might be the better way forward.

Reply via email to