On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:38 AM juan carlos morales < dev.juan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looked for a potential problem out of doing such a change but I could not > find anything. > Then I'd say it's a no-brainer. The current 2 MB limit is simply outdated and needs to be increased to something a little more realistic. That said, I think 50 MB may be pushing it. How about 20 MB, instead? > > But for sure such a change should be well marked in case is merge. > > I did not take look at the PR as that can wait also. > > Lets respect the RFC protocol and wait the specified time to see if someone > else comes with something. > > By the Way... This needs an RFC right? > Yes, most definitely.
