On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 16:05, Max Kellermann <max+...@blarg.de> wrote:
> > OK, that seems clear. As far as I can see, this is the first time on this > > thread or either of the PR threads that you've actually explained that > > violation. > > I explained it already: > > https://github.com/derickr/timelib/pull/141#issuecomment-1386800720 > Right, I missed that amongst the other comments. Which, again, is why I was prompting you to clearly summarise the rationale for the change in one place, to clear up any misunderstandings. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
