Hi Everyone, Yesterday, I updated the voting choices based on Rowan's suggestions. I also picked a few signatures where only one migration path is proposed (the short one).
Now, I'd be curious what to do with the FFI methods in question ( https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_functions_with_overloaded_signatures#fficast_ffinew_and_ffitype). .. Especially, it would be very nice to hear about FFI users' opinions. Also, there was feedback about the session_set_save_handlers() function name that it shouldn't resemble this much to the original session_set_save_handler(). Rowan suggested using the session_set_save_handler_functions() name. While I'm not a big fan of this choice, I'd be interested in if there is any other idea? Particularly, I have been wondering for a long time, why the original function includes "save_handler" in its name? The passed in handlers are not just "save", but also other kinds of handlers (e.g. "read"). So I'm considering to use something like "session_set_handlers()" or "session_set_handler_callbacks()". What do you think about these names? If we manage to answer these questions then I'd like to start the vote not long afterwards. Regards, Máté
