> I know that the `fn` Syntax is already used for arrow functions, but what
i
> am suggesting is that, can't we make `fn` to be used in naming methods in
> class? (this will be optional though),
Hello Oladoyinbo,
Personally for me, if I see `fn` in methods instead of `function` I would
expect
it behave as `fn`-anonymous arrow function. E.g.:
```php
class Example
{
public fn getMyProperty() -> $this->myProperty;
}
```
What do you think about it?
Best regards,
Oleksii Bulba
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, 21:31 Oladoyinbo Vincent, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Internals,
>
> I don't know maybe this discussion has been raised before, but i feel we
> should re-discuss this.
>
> `function` syntax is kinda verbose for naming methods in class, let's take
> a look at the below example:
>
>
> ```php
>
> class Greet {
>
> public function __construct(
> private string $name,
> private string $city
> ) {}
>
> private function init(): string
> {
> return "Hello {$this->name}, From {$this->city}";
> }
> }
>
> ```
>
> I know that the `fn` Syntax is already used for arrow functions, but what i
> am suggesting is that, can't we make `fn` to be used in naming methods in
> class? (this will be optional though),
>
>
> I mean like:
>
> ```php
>
> class Greet {
>
> public fn __construct(
> public string $name,
> public string $city
> ) {}
>
> private fn init(): string
> {
> return "Hello {$this->name}, From {$this->city}";
> }
> }
>
> ```
>
> The above code looks cool, readable and less verbose, what is your opinion
> on this?
>
