Hi
On 4/8/24 14:00, Pablo Rauzy wrote:
So what should be done to move forward with this?
Should the old RFC on strict argument count be revived?
Or should a new RFC proposal be written? If so, should it contain an
It should be a new "v2" RFC. The old RFC already contains a vote, thus
editing it would change historic votes.
approval voting (where voters can select any number of candidates),
prior to the RFC proposal vote itself, to decide if the change should
be: strict argument count, using the void keyword to explicitely stop
the argument list, or using a #[Nonvariadic] attribute?
And RFC needs a clear primary vote. I believe the options you mentioned
are too different to usefully be voted on with a single primary vote + a
"tie breaker". I believe it should be a simple opinionated RFC. Should
it not pass, follow-up RFCs for the alternative options can be proposed
if it is desired.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
