Hi all.
> Em sex., 7 de jun. de 2024 às 17:53, Pierre <[email protected]>
escreveu:
> I do agree with you that when you use value objects, you need it a lot,
> but I'd much prefer having a JS like value objects initializer syntax,
> such as `Point {x: 1, y: 2}` syntax than creating another way to call
> the constructor, which already has a mastered and comprehensive syntax
> which is simply `new`.
I also think that `new `(4 chars, if we count the blank space) is short
enough.
But a JS-like syntax that's already known for representing objects could be
used.
I'm sympathetic to something like this (changing the OP examples):
class A {
public function b() {
echo "I'm B";
}
}
A::{}->b();
class Foo {
public function __construct(
public string $name
) {}
}
class Bar {
public function __construct(
public Foo $foo
) {}
}
$bar = Bar::{ Foo::{ "I'm foo in bar" } };
echo $bar->foo->name;
#[AttributeOverrides([
AttributeOverride::{
name: "id",
column: Column::{ name: "guest_id", type: "integer", length: 140 }
},
AttributeOverride::{
name: "name",
column: Column::{ name: "guest_name", nullable: false, unique:
true, length: 240 }
}]
)]
#[AttributeOverrides([
AttributeOverride::{
name: "id",
column: Column::{ name: "guest_id", type: "integer", length: 140 }
},
AttributeOverride::{
name: "name",
column: Column::{ name: "guest_name", nullable: false, unique:
true, length: 240 }
}]
)]
--
Erick
