On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 19:31, Ben Ramsey wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2024, at 12:25, Saki Takamachi <s...@sakiot.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> Sure, it’s allowed to change its mind, but if we bring this for a vote in > >> two weeks, and then we vote a week later for the other (or even at the > >> same time), I would see the results of those votes as conflicting > >> viewpoints and not as the community changing its mind within the span of a > >> few weeks. > > > > I am pretty sure there is no chance that another RFC will start voting at > > the same time as this one (unless they ignore the discussion and start it > > forcefully). > > > > And even if they were to force a vote, it would have almost no chance of > > passing. > > > > Regards, > > > > Saki > > > Fair enough. I agree that we probably won’t find ourselves in this > hypothetical conflicting state. > > Cheers, > Ben >
I think it is extremely likely they'll be out for a vote at the exact same time. I literally just finished the implementation and example code. I'll probably be opening a PR in the morning (EU time) as well as updating the RFC with clearer examples, details for implementors, etc. My RFC includes a vote that this RFC encompasses, so it seems like a pissing match just for the sake of pissing. — Rob
