On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 22:09, Robert Silva wrote:
> Based on the issues you listed, how about:
>
> function Method((MyClass) $obj);
> function Method([MyClass] $obj);
>
> Surrounding the class type in () or [] thereby marking it as optional.
> Much like you would do when commenting a function to take an optional
> parameter.
I like this idea and just for the sake of consideration and to elaborate
on it:
function Method( [MyClass,YourClass,null,bool] $obj );
which would allow all of the above types as values for $obj. Which would
allow a great deal of flexibility while retaining a good deal of
readability.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
