Hi, I've found a discussion about Records https://externals.io/message/125975 and found a one key point which I really like in Kotlin (hello): short constructors.
Rob said that short constructor will be probably removed: 5. Inline constructor isn’t necessary and could be proposed separately. I’ve thought recently about this feature I will probably remove this, to be honest. It was for nesting records inside classes or other records, but this feature was declined, so there isn't really a need for it. Whether it's true or not I've played with syntax analyser and created a sugared polyfill for short constructors: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/19133 Many examples of how it works inside the PR, just read them. Should I propose the RFC or not? This step move us further to "light" structures or "heavy" structures written "simple": class RedBox extends Box(width: 50, height: 200); $box = new RedBox(); instead of class RedBox extends Box { public function __construct() { parent::__construct(width: 50, height: 200); } } OR class RedBox extends Box { public function getWidth(): int { return 50; } public function getHeight(): int { return 200; } } OR even with Single Expression Functions RFC: class RedBox extends Box { public function getWidth(): int => 50; public function getHeight(): int => 200; } -- Best regards, Dmitrii Derepko. @xepozz