On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > Am 2025-07-22 22:02, schrieb Larry Garfield: >> It seems the discussion has quieted down and wasn't particularly >> contentious to begin with (whew), so we're just about ready for a vote. > > Would it not be appropriate to answer unanswered questions in the > discussion (i.e. mine from 12 days ago) and making the previously > announced changes (i.e. the ones that Arnaud announced 20 days ago) to > the RFC text before claiming that the discussion has quieted down and > that the RFC is ready for a vote? > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus
Hm, I thought Arnaud had already addressed those, sorry. I'll have to try to replicate the debug output bits sometime tonight on the current branch to include them in the RFC text. What other changes there are unaccounted for? I thought we'd kept up on the behavioral ones. --Larry Garfield
