> I would recommend reviewing your tests and matching up each of them to where > you mention that behavior or define it in the RFC. If the tests are > implementation-specific, then it needs to be defined in the RFC. Yes, in some tests I break best practices and rely on implementation details to verify behavior. This makes the tests fragile.
> For example, you say that the scheduler is 100% an implementation detail, > but your outputs in the tests rely on a specific ordered queue. Yes, I’m a lazy programmer :) > I wish you the best, Thank you. --- Best regards, Ed
