On Mar 12, 2026, at 2:54 PM, Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026, at 10:53 AM, Calvin Buckley wrote: >> On Mar 11, 2026, at 3:35 PM, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> 3. >>> >>> For the voting options: You need to define a tie-breaker for the secondary >>> votes. >> >> I might be a little dense here; I see tie-breakers mentioned in >> feature-proposals, but I don't see any guidance on how to include them >> in an RFC. The other RFCs I've been skimming don't seem to mention them >> either. > > Just put something like "in case of a tie, the default will be 1" above that > voting widget. (Or 0 if you want to go that way.) Same for the other one. > > Few RFCs have secondary votes, so you won't see it very often. And they > don't always mention a tie breaker, even though they arguably should. > > --Larry Garfield
Sorry for the late response, I've added tiebreakers to the vote section.
