Hi, On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 12:39 PM Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jakub, > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026, 4:47 PM Jakub Zelenka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >>> >> As I told you many times, the things that you mentioned can be easily >> added later without any BC impact - >> > > > first of all, and let me remind you to keep your tone respectful. This is > not ok nor reflect the discussion we had here. > The tone was respectful. I just thought it was many times but in fact I told you just twice so sorry about that "many". I would just assume that it should be clear that there is no BC concern. Especially my second replay was quite clear and you never explained the BC concern later: > I don't see how it takes more effort later. There is also pretty much no BC break even if we went if subclassing exceptions as I noted before. I think actually exactly opposite here. If we rush it and use incorrect categories for some errors, it will be a BC break to correct so this needs a proper considering and this feature should be added later. I removed classification completely so I have no idea what that second vote would be about. Anyway let's agree to disagree here. Kind regards Jakub
