On 25/06/2026 8:47 pm, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2026 at 12:07, Steven Wilton <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I have gone through the RFC process for a bunch of new functionality for
the SNMP module and wanted to check if there's anything else I need to
do to move this forward, or if it's in the queue and waiting for the
appropriate releases?
Hello Steven,
I'll have a look next week after I come back from a conference as I will need
to learn about SNMP.
Best regards,
Gina P. Banyard
Hi Gina,
I've updated the security protocol PR based on your comment (I agree
with the suggested simplification), so that should hopefully be ready now.
I think I've fixed the formatting option PR as requested, with the
exception of the const definitions in the snmp.stub.php file. I've
extended the existing technique of using the values from the net-snmp
library, and I think it works quite well (it avoids having to map from
the PHP SNMP_* values back to the equivalent net-nsmp NETSNMP_*
values). All code in the php-snmp module checks that a valid value has
been passed before use. I will change this if you can see additional
benefits (I may need some guidance on the correct way to achieve this),
but I personally like the way the existing code works, and changing it
would require modifying the original php-snmp code.
Can you please have a look at the PRs for the 2 items above and let me
know if they are ready to squash and merge. Once the above 2 are done I
can rebase the third PR and get that ready for merging.
regards
Steve
