On Thu, Oct 29, 2026, at 21:18, Sjoerd Langkemper wrote: > Thank you for the thorough review. > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2026, at 15:18, Tim Düsterhus wrote: >> An operation that is not applicable sounds like an Exception to me. > I can see the appeal of throwing a specific exception (e.g. > UnsupportedChannelBinding extends OpensslExtension). Then if the function > returns something the caller knows it is a valid channel binding value.
I changed the RFC to reflect this. openssl_get_channel_binding can no longer return null, but it can throw a (newly introduced) UnsupportedChannelBindingException. Regards, Sjoerd
