On 8/9/05, Andreas Korthaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By using lighttpd with fastcgi we seperate the webserver process from > php processes (which could even work on other machines)...
Someone else emailed me about using FastCGI with Apache 2.1/event but I just figured that there would be a significant slowdown using FastCGI rather than a module/handler. (Currently I compile PHP into Apache statically and turn off Apache's dynamic module loading ability -- something I couldn't figure out in Apache2). What is your experience with FastCGI? > For simple dynamic requests we can use mod_cml Sadly, this won't work with any system I manage since we do a lot of stat reporting, even on a per user basis. And we need to have PHP loaded to know the user, etc... Still, I looked at lighttpd and it looks promising. The one thing that started all of this was Apache 2.1's event MPM that used a single thread to handle all open Keep-Alives looked very efficient. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
