+1 "Marcus Boerger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello Wez, > > we could however drop '<%' support and introduce '<?php=' support. > Along with that we might even add an E_STRICT to protect against '<?'. > > regards > marcus > > Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 7:04:27 PM, you wrote: > > > But that's not going to happen any time soon (if ever); far too many > > scripts use it. > > > --Wez. > > > On 8/31/05, John Coggeshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Removing the <?= syntax from PHP 6 entirely right along with <% seems > >> like a much better idea to me then trying to expand upon it. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> John > >> > >> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 15:23 +0200, Ron Korving wrote: > >> > Can't help it... ;) By the way, I thought all programmers were lazy to some > >> > extent? > >> > > >> > Seriously though, I think it would be nice and consistent if it would work. > >> > I just really like the short <?= syntax. > >> > > >> > Ron > >> > > >> > > >> > "Joseph Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Why do you find the need to be lazy and use <?=$foo?> lol j/k > >> > > >> > i always use <?php echo $foo; ?> it may be only a few more chars of code but > >> > it is guranteed to work on any php installation ;) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Joseph Crawford Jr. > >> > Codebowl Solutions, Inc. > >> > 1-802-671-2021 > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
