If we rule out :::, it should be <- instead.
Foo:>bar:>Baz::getTest()->foo();
vs
Foo<-bar<-Baz::getTest()->foo();
The latter looks better to me. I'd still prefer
Foo:::bar:::Baz::getTest()->foo();
though.
- David
Am 27.11.2005 um 01:28 schrieb Eric Coleman:
I'd have to vote for either <- or :>. I perfer the later.
\ is kinda crappy. Looks weird, as does %%. Looks like a mess.
-- Eric Coleman
On Nov 26, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
Oliver Grätz wrote:
Oliver Grätz schrieb:
:> <:: <- <: ..
Whoops, forgot to add "%%"
+1 for <- here. It makes namespace hierarchies resemble diagrams
of the same hierarchies (like inheritance in UML). It also
visually makes sense, isn't hard to type, and doesn't look like a
smiley (like :> etc).
--
Jasper Bryant-Greene
General Manager
Album Limited
+64 21 708 334
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
