Andi Gutmans wrote: > I'm with Rasmus on the break label stuff. Although it's not confusing to > me, I got convinced quickly that it'll be confusing to the wider > audience. So big -1 from me for (2) & (1).
>From your comment bellow I figure you're for option 2, right? Edin > I think we should either stick with nothing or go to a full goto > (without jumping into scopes of course). Only forward gotos would go > against one of the main initial motivations for discussing this which > was state machines. > > I suggest we apply this and allow people to play around with it/test it.... > > Btw, how about naming it "jump" and not "goto"? :) > Andi > > At 01:28 AM 3/7/2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and >> post it >> for discussion once again together with GOTO patch. >> >> Please reviw and vote. >> >> 1) goto and break label >> 2) goto only (like C) >> 3) break label only (like Java) >> 4) nothing >> >> My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5 >> >> Thanks. Dmitry. >> >> >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
